Cases 71 - 80 of 99
STEANS v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv03838
Plaintiff:
ANDREKA SHONTE STEANS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DIPATRIZIO v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv03250
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
BARRY J. DIPATRIZIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
EWING v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv03230
Plaintiff:
MEGAN N EWING
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SOUTHERLAND v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv03447
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY J. SOUTHERLAND
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LINDLEY v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv02687
Plaintiff:
JANET M. LINDLEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BOYD v. BERRYHILL
as 4:2018cv00154
Plaintiff:
Patrick Boyd
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WILLIS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2017cv00615
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
CHARLOTTE E. WILLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
SECKMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2014cv00926
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
STEVEN SECKMAN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
THORNTON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 4:2013cv00019
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
RICHARD B. THORNTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
BALDOCK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2012cv01639
Plaintiff:
JOYCE E. BALDOCK
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
