Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
MCGLOTHLEN et al v. M & M ENTERPRISES CORPORATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00174
Defendant: M & M ENTERPRISES CORPORATION
Plaintiff: CHARLES MCGLOTHLEN and WANDA LYNNE MCGLOTHLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
M. v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
as 3:2014cv00150
Plaintiff: M. M.
Defendant: SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
M. v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
as 4:2014cv00126
Plaintiff: M. M.
Defendant: SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
B. et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00422
Plaintiff: A. B., K. M., M. M. and others
Defendant: WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
INDIANA BUSINESS BANK v. M & M AUTO WASH, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00457
Plaintiff: INDIANA BUSINESS BANK
Defendant: INDIANA STATEWIDE CERTIFIED DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, M & M AUTO WASH, LLC, CURTIS A. REID and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00389
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. MORGAN et al
as 1:2010cv00946
Plaintiff: AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: G. M., M. M., ANNDRA MORGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Type: Contract Insurance
BARTON et al v. M & M BEVERAGES, LLC
as 1:2008cv00203
Plaintiff: DANNY BARTON and INDIANA TEAMSTERS HEALTH BENEFITS FUND
Defendant: M & M BEVERAGES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?