Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
BAYLES v. THE HERTZ CORPORATION
as 1:2022cv01092
Plaintiff: Annette Bayles
Defendant: The Hertz Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
TROTTA v. THE HERTZ CORPORATION
as 1:2011cv00347
Defendant: THE HERTZ CORPORATION
Plaintiff: MICHAEL J. TROTTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01064
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00922
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00791
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00367
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Claimant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WHITNEY v. THE HERTZ CORPORATION EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN
as 1:2007cv00099
Plaintiff: WILLIAM WHITNEY
Defendant: THE HERTZ CORPORATION EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN, THE HERTZ CORPORATION EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN and THE HERTZ CORPORATION EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?