Cases 11 - 20 of 328
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Jipson et al v. Workman et al
as 5:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Hillary Jipson and Elijah Reeves
Defendant:
Robert Workman and Montgomery County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Jones v. Perryville Police
as 5:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Perryville Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pate v. City of Georgetown Kentucky et al
as 5:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
Whitney Pate
Defendant:
City of Georgetown Kentucky, Georgetown Police Department and Officer Aaron Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
French v. Brislin et al
as 5:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
Antwon Francois French
Defendant:
Traci H Brislin doing business as Traci Hamlin Brislin doing business as Traci Hamlin, Richard Dawahare, Boyd Minnifield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Townsend v. Harris
as 5:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Hunter Austin Lee Townsend
Defendant:
TJ Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
