Cases 31 - 40 of 328
Gardner v. Lexington Fayette Urban County, et al
as 5:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Glendrick Gardner
Defendant:
Lexington Fayette Urban County, et al, Russell Scott, William Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. - Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
South Elkhorn Village v. Georgetown et al
as 5:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
South Elkhorn Village, LLC
Defendant:
City of Georgetown, Georgetown Municipal Water and Sewer System, Chase Azevedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Musick v. Ward et al
as 5:2022cv00320
Plaintiff:
Joshua Musick
Defendant:
Robert Ward and Cody Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Norman v. Horton
as 5:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
John Norman
Defendant:
Joseph Horton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
