Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Simmons v. United States of America Probation Supervised Release et al
as 2:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Tavo Simmons
Respondent:
United States of America Probation Supervised Release, Natasha Alexander Mingo and Chante Pagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Frazer v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
John J. Frazer
Defendant:
United States of America and Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mobley v. FCI Memphis Warden et al
as 5:2022cv00285
Petitioner:
Kenneth Mobley
Respondent:
FCI Memphis Warden and United States of America Wardens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramos-Andino v. United States of America
as 0:2022cv00058
Petitioner:
Lornie Ariel Ramos-Andino
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Herman v. USA
as 6:2022cv00040
Petitioner:
Terrion D Herman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Borden v. USA
as 6:2021cv00035
Petitioner:
Jason Dean Borden
Respondent:
United States of America and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Linot v. USA
as 5:2021cv00025
Petitioner:
Carmel Linot
Respondent:
United States of America and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 5:2020cv00314
Petitioner:
Joseph Gerald Smith
Respondent:
United States of America, Warden Quintana and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dota v. United States Of America
as 5:2020cv00248
Respondent:
United States Of America
Petitioner:
Richard Marion Dota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brearton v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv00142
Plaintiff:
Jesse L. Brearton
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
