Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Gonzalez et al v. Lusardi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00142
Plaintiff: Anthony Gonzalez , Theresa Principata , Betsy Miller and others
Defendant: Michael Lusardi, Joshua Bornhorn, Fulton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rawlings et al v. Cabinet for Health and Family Services Division et al
as 3:2010cv00002
Plaintiff: Linda S. Rawlings, Reuben C. Rawlings, Ashley N. Rawlings and others
Defendant: Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Malcomb Leatherwood, Dickey David and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis et al v. Laurel County Sheriff's Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2009cv00280
Plaintiff: Joe C. Lewis, Jr. and Dalton Brewer
Defendant: Laurel County Sheriff's Department and Richard Sapcut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00113
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Thompson et al v. JP Morgan Chase Custody Services, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv00127
Plaintiff: Katherine D. Thompson and Harold L. Thompson
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase Custody Services, Inc., JP Morgan Chase Custody Services, Inc., JP Morgan Chase and Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00021
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hill v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 5:2008cv00330
Plaintiff: Michelle Hill and Michelle Hill
Defendant: Commonwealth of Kentucky, Department of Public Advocacy, Robert Ewald and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?