Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Nichols v. Boyd County Detention Center
as 0:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
Nathan Nichols, Sr.
Defendant:
Boyd County Detention Center, Joe Birchett, Tom Jurta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kittle v. Boyd County Detention Center et al
as 0:2013cv00012
Plaintiff:
Roger Kittle, Jr.
Defendant:
Boyd County Detention Center, Joe Burchett, Tom Jurta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGrew v. Boyd County Detention Center et al
as 0:2012cv00101
Plaintiff:
Thomas Eric McGrew
Defendant:
Boyd County Detention Center, Danny, Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullikin et al v. Rice et al
as 2:2010cv00294
Plaintiff:
Jason Mullikin
Defendant:
Ron Rice, Justin Horch, Lisa O'Hearn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stapleton v. Jones
as 5:2010cv00298
Plaintiff:
Paul Allen Stapleton
Defendant:
Tom Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baze v. Huddleston et al
as 3:2010cv00021
Plaintiff:
Ralph Baze
Defendant:
Hobert Huddleston, Tom Simpson, LaDonna Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baze v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00054
Plaintiff:
Ralph Stephens Baze, Jr.
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, John D. Rees, Lisa Lamb and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Young v. Simpson
as 5:2007cv00378
Petitioner:
Gerald Young
Respondent:
Tom Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Croney et al v. Fletcher et al
as 3:2007cv00042
Plaintiff:
Fred Douglas Croney, Jr.
Defendant:
Ernie Fletcher, Tom Hardesty, Hart McGivins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Dailey
as 3:2007cv00041
Petitioner:
Russell B. Hill
Respondent:
Tom Dailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
