Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Cases 31 - 40 of 7,528
Kennedy v. Crews et al
as 0:2024cv00029
Plaintiff: Scott Patrick Kennedy
Defendant: Cookie Crews, David Green, Lt. Nathan Elam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Cookie Crews et al
as 5:2024cv00077
Plaintiff: Kyle Thompson
Defendant: Cookie Crews, Allyson Lambert, Amanda Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
M.T.B. v. Byers et al
as 2:2024cv00028
Petitioner: M.T.B.
Respondent: Shawn Byers and Jailer Jason Maydak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nolan v. Mazza
as 2:2024cv00061
Petitioner: Timothy Nolan
Respondent: Warden Kevin Mazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sisco v. USA
as 7:2024cv00034
Petitioner: Eugene Sisco, III
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Sutton v. USA
as 2:2024cv00059
Petitioner: Randall Sutton
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Robertson v. David Paul
as 5:2024cv00056
Petitioner: Demetrius M. Robertson
Respondent: David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Goff v. Little Sandy Correctional Complex
as 0:2024cv00028
Plaintiff: Kamron Goff
Defendant: Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guzman v. USA
as 6:2024cv00050
Petitioner: Marco Guzman
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dixon v. USP Big Sandy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2024cv00033
Petitioner: Lenard Chauncy Dixon
Respondent: Warden, USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?