Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Cases 1 - 10 of 7,625
Shreffler v. Tussey et al
as 5:2024cv00254
Defendant: John Sturniolo, Sam Hensley and Terry Tussey
Plaintiff: Mark Shreffler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Gilley et al
as 6:2024cv00133
Plaintiff: Adam Eugene Martin
Defendant: Baker, Baker, Asher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brush v. USA
as 5:2024cv00246
Petitioner: Raymond Bradley Brush
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Washington v. LeMaster
as 0:2024cv00089
Petitioner: Brian Jermaine Washington
Respondent: Warden David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lyttle v. USA
as 2:2024cv00143
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Dominique Lyttle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Khan v. Paul
as 5:2024cv00243
Defendant: Warden David Paul
Plaintiff: Omar Khan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
New York State Correctional v. McCray
as 2:2024cv00142
Plaintiff: New York State Correctional
Defendant: Ricardo McCray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Madison County Fiscal Court et al
as 5:2024cv00240
Defendant: Jailer Steve Tussey, Unknown WKCH Medical Doctors / Nurses / Staff, Madison County Fiscal Court and others
Plaintiff: Penny Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Henny v Warden David Paul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00239
Defendant: Warden David Paul
Plaintiff: Kimberly Ann Henny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gant v. Hicks
as 7:2024cv00051
Plaintiff: Montecarlos Marteze Gant
Defendant: L.T. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?