Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Scoggins v. Warden USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00135
Respondent:
Warden USP McCreary
Petitioner:
David Michael Scoggins, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Potter v. McKenzie et al
as 0:2024cv00065
Defendant:
Shawn McKenzie and Cookie Crews
Plaintiff:
James Carr Potter, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Mosley
as 6:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Dayton Rice, II, Peewee and Dayton Ray Rice, II
Defendant:
Jaime Mosley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houchin et al v. Williams et al
as 0:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Leroy Alvin Houchin, II and Tabitha Bearden
Defendant:
Kevin Williams, Ashland Police Department, Boyd County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Martinson v. Koyle et al
as 2:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Anthony Geno Martinson
Defendant:
Ken Koyle, Delta Private Jets, Jason Hiltz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wiley v. Green, et al
as 0:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Allen Wiley II and Allen Wiley, III
Defendant:
David Green, Nicholas Cleverger, Tyler Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. USA
as 0:2022cv00093
Petitioner:
Ronnie Johnson, II
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Starghill v. USA
as 7:2022cv00102
Petitioner:
Richard L. Starghill and Richard L. Starghill, II
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Pollard v. West et al
as 5:2021cv00318
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Pollard, II and Joe Pollard
Defendant:
Captain Wesley J West, Captain S. Morgerson, Lt. R. Meadows and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Key, II v. USA
as 2:2021cv00152
Petitioner:
Daniel J. Key, II
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
