Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Martin v. Warden USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00090
Petitioner:
Adam Eugene Martin
Respondent:
Warden USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
El-Bey v. Warden at FMC Lexington et al
as 5:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Jttonali One Eye El-Bey
Defendant:
Warden at FMC Lexington and C.O. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Couch v. Clay County Detention Center et al
as 6:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant:
Clay County Detention Center, Linda Smallwood, Michael Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shannon et al v. Burberry et al
as 5:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Mark Shannon, Jeff Tucker, William Peters and others
Defendant:
West Burberry and Bourbon County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Warden
as 6:2022cv00178
Petitioner:
Odell Martin, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bradley v. Laurel County, KY. et al
as 6:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
David M. Bradley
Defendant:
Laurel County, KY., Jamie Mosley, Gary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. FMC Lexington et al
as 5:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jttonali One Eye El-Bey
Defendant:
FMC Lexington and Ofc. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. USA
as 5:2022cv00045
Petitioner:
Louis L. Martin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Che-Adkins v. Mosley et al
as 6:2021cv00184
Plaintiff:
Frank Melvin Che-Adkins
Defendant:
Jamie Mosley, Travis Cathers, Shawn Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Beard et al
as 0:2021cv00050
Petitioner:
Donald Lynn Martin
Respondent:
H. Allen Beard and David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
