Cases 1 - 10 of 222
England v. Lovette et al
as 6:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Timothy E. England
Defendant:
Warden Lovette and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
Gorbey v. Doe et al
as 6:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey, Tsunami Khan and Chief Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe, Mr. Stoval, Tony Shult and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Feltner v. Kentucky River Regional Authority et al
as 6:2024cv00059
Executor:
Kendra Feltner
Defendant:
Kentucky River Regional Authority, Kentucky River Regional Jail, Inc., Perry County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffman v. Roby
as 6:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
Timothy S. Coffman
Respondent:
Amy Roby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abney v. USA
as 5:2024cv00076
Petitioner:
Kevin S. Abney
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jones v. Kenton County, Kentucky et al
as 2:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Tonya Jones
Defendant:
Kenton County, Kentucky, Jailer Marc L. Fields, Deputy Jailer Jared Capps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Gilley et al
as 6:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. Jones
Defendant:
Warden Gilley, J. Hutson, Larry Monhollen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lewis v. Swaney
as 6:2023cv00190
Petitioner:
Damon S. Lewis and Damon Steven Lewis
Respondent:
G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Salahuddin v. USA
as 5:2023cv00294
Petitioner:
Jymie S. Salahuddin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lewis v. Swaney
as 6:2023cv00153
Petitioner:
Damon S. Lewis and D-Bo
Respondent:
G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
