Cases 61 - 70 of 160
Cannon v. Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2018cv00324
Defendant:
2 Unknown Officials, Warden FCI "2" Butner, NC, Unit Manager Scarentino and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Cannon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chestnut v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2018cv00105
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Chestnut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belt v. Northeast Regional Health Services Administrator et al
as 0:2018cv00095
Defendant:
Jose A. Santana, Special Agent-In-Charge, FCC - Ashland, KY., Chief Psychologist, FCC/FPC/FCI - Ashland, KY and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ray Belt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00523
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Lawson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2018cv00070
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Jerome Lawson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Trust Fund of U.S.P. - Big Sandy, Arrington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Callahan et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2018cv00389
Plaintiff:
Scott O. Callahan
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Steven Garcia and Francisco Quintana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Millhouse v. Jones et al
as 6:2018cv00125
Plaintiff:
Kareem Millhouse
Defendant:
Rhonda Jones, Pamela Kenny, R. Cimorossa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hanson v. USA et al
as 6:2018cv00017
Plaintiff:
Bryan Alan Hanson
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, S. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2017cv00447
Petitioner:
Ulysses Williams
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and U.S. Marshal Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Woody v. USA et al
as 0:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
Thomas Franklin Woody
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, James Winston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
