Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Primm et al v. Clark County, KY et al
as 5:2020cv00336
Defendant:
Melissa Montgomery, Harold Little, Dr. Everson and others
Plaintiff:
Tresina Primm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arriola et al v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2017cv00100
Plaintiff:
Antonio Arriola , Keath Bramblett , Christopher Hopper and others
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky , Commonwealth of Kentucky Cabinet for Justice and Public Safety , Commonwealth of Kentucky Corrections Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Keene et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00214
Plaintiff:
Mary Keene , George Keene , Judy Humphrey and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , aaiPharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hopper v. KMART Corporation
as 6:2015cv00209
Plaintiff:
Robert Hopper
Defendant:
KMART Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hopper v. USA
as 2:2015cv07410
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David S. Hopper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hopper v. Kentucky State Police et al
as 3:2013cv00077
Petitioner:
Terry W. Hopper
Respondent:
Kentucky State Police and Cambellsville, Post
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hopper v. Trimble County Police
as 3:2013cv00062
Petitioner:
Terry W. Hopper
Respondent:
Trimble County Police
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hopper v. USA
as 2:2013cv07267
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David S Hopper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Keene et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00072
Plaintiff:
Mary Keene , George Keene , Judy Humphrey and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Eli Lilly and Company , Generics Bidco I, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
