Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Israel v. Brewer et al
as 7:2024cv00060
Defendant:
Ms. S. Hudson, David Brewer, Mr. D. McCarroll and others
Plaintiff:
Solomon Israel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Davenport v. May et al
as 5:2024cv00201
Defendant:
Supervisor Detective Matthew Silver, Detective Franklin Eply, Patrol Officer Alex Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Damon Davenport, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
May v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
as 7:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Jerry May
Defendant:
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. doing business as Medtronic Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Davenport v. May et al
as 5:2024cv00176
Defendant:
Matthew Silver, Traci Canner, Alex Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Damon Davenport, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Thompson v. Cookie Crews et al
as 5:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Kyle Thompson
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Allyson Lambert, Amanda Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Couch v. Teen Challenge America Chad's Hope et al
as 6:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant:
Teen Challenge America Chad's Hope, Steve May and Forrest Quillon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. SSA
as 7:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Ladonna Kay May
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mays v. Paul
as 5:2023cv00093
Petitioner:
Marcello M Mays
Respondent:
Warden Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mays v. Warden Paul
as 5:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Marcello M Mays
Defendant:
Warden Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.