Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Gibson v. City of Sturgis, Kentucky et al
as 4:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
Tonja Gibson
Defendant:
City of Sturgis, Kentucky , Sturgis, Kentucky Police Department , Duane Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mast et al v. The City of Auburn, Kentucky et al
as 1:2017cv00016
Plaintiff:
Dan Mast and Emanuel Miller
Defendant:
City of Auburn, Kentucky , Michael A. Hughes and Larry Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hopson v. Spencer et al
as 3:2013cv00080
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Hopson
Defendant:
Ruth Ann Spencer, Judge Collins, Susan Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. MLS Holdings, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
Elberta Jones
Defendant:
MLS Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Silverburg, et al. v. Bernheim, et al.
as 3:2012cv00213
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Silverburg and Elberta Jones-Silverburg
Defendant:
Jessie N. Bernheim, Esq., Robert M. Dolinsky, Esq., Rosanna Heinrichs and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Fields v. Benningfield et al
as 1:2011cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jerry Fields
Defendant:
Rick Benningfield, Eddie "Hack" Marcum, Taylor County Fiscal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Trumbo
as 3:2010cv00742
Plaintiff:
Bernice Jones , Southern Health Partners, Inc. , Larue County, Kentucky and others
Defendant:
Ralph Trumbo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Jewish Hospital & St. Mary's Healthcare
as 3:2010cv00681
Plaintiff:
Cherrika Jones
Defendant:
Jewish Hospital & St. Mary's Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. Jones et al
as 1:2010cv00069
Plaintiff:
Harold Dee Jones and Dewey Lynn Hines
Defendant:
Jackie T. Strode, Gayle Eston, Rodney Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Hopkins
as 3:2010cv00098
Defendant:
Carolyn Jones Hopkins
Plaintiff:
Karen Jones Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
