Cases 81 - 90 of 1,992
Washington v. Johnson
as 3:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
Robbie Washington
Defendant:
Abigial Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. Culp
as 3:2023cv00482
Plaintiff:
Robbie Washington
Defendant:
H. Lawrence Culp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Washington v. Leileson
as 3:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Robbie Washington
Defendant:
Jennifer Leileson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. Social Security Administration et al
as 3:2023cv00469
Plaintiff:
Frederick D. Jones
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and St. Joseph County Child Support Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Deng v. Boom
as 3:2023cv00489
Plaintiff:
Ngong Lang Deng
Defendant:
Judge Claria Horn Boom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chapman et al v. Logan County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Jesse L. Chapman and Laura Chapman
Defendant:
Logan County Sheriff Department, Logan County Sheriff Stephen Stratton, Jarrod Brian Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Akouala v. Key Bank et al
as 3:2023cv00432
Plaintiff:
Christian Akouala
Defendant:
Key Bank, First Bank and USCIS Louisville Field Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Washington v. United States District Court
as 3:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Robbie Washington
Defendant:
United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meador et al v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 4:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Lila Meador and M.M.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Deaconess Gateway Hospital, Owensboro Health Regional Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham v. City of St. Louis, Missouri
as 3:2023cv00426
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Ernest Graham
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
