Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
7th Street Bar & Grill, LLC v. City of Shively, KY et al
as 3:2018cv00458
Plaintiff:
7th Street Bar & Grill, LLC
Defendant:
City of Shively, KY, Officer Edward Edbrooke, Shively Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Kirilova v. Braun et al
as 3:2017cv00481
Plaintiff:
Reinella S. Kirilova
Defendant:
Russell Braun, Randall Richardson and Paige Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett et al v. Young et al
as 3:2016cv00169
Defendant:
Thomas Young , Mike Robinson and City of Hardinsburg, Kentucky
Plaintiff:
Edwin Eugene Bennett and Norma Kay Green Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Youngblood v. The City of Paducah et al
as 5:2015cv00060
Plaintiff:
Erica Youngblood
Defendant:
The City of Paducah, Paducah Police Department, Danny Carrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mize et al v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 1:2014cv00171
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Mize and Corey Mize
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service, Jackie Strode, Tom Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D.H. v. Matti et al
as 3:2014cv00732
Plaintiff:
D.H. and Richard Harris
Defendant:
Todd Matti , Scotty Singleton , City of Brandenburg, Kentucky and others
Counter_claimant:
Todd Matti
Counter_defendant:
D.H. and Richard Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
