Cases 31 - 40 of 327
Sprasky v. Brady et al
as 4:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Allan Renaldo Sprasky
Defendant:
Amy Brady, William Payne, Wilburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silva v. Auld et al
as 4:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Daniel Silva
Defendant:
L. Patrick Auld, William Campbell, Rascoe S. Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Martin et al
as 1:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Williams
Defendant:
Gary Martin and Phil Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Deon'tae L. Williams
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Seth Mitchell, Laura Plauppert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Crafton et al
as 1:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Williams
Defendant:
Deputy Crystal Crafton, Captain Mark Martin, Jailer Phil Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyer v. Robey et al
as 1:2022cv00061
Petitioner:
William L. Boyer
Respondent:
Amy Robey and Daniel Camron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Schanks et al
as 3:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
UA Schanks, Officer William Willson, Lt. Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. Jordan et al
as 5:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Isaiah William Tyler
Defendant:
Warden Scott Jordan and Commissioner Cookie Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Clark
as 3:2022cv00158
Plaintiff:
Mikell Williams
Defendant:
Dwayne Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimmons v. Fulton County Detention Center et al
as 5:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
Robert Kimmons
Defendant:
Fulton County Detention Center, Steve Williams, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.