Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Riches v. Hughes et al
as 3:2010cv00493
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Amanda Hughes and Karen Sypher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pratt v. Riches et al
as 3:2010cv00426
Plaintiff:
Spencer Pratt and Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Heidi Montag and Amanda Leigh Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Riches v. Wooden et al
as 4:2010cv00078
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
John Robert Wooden, Denny Crum and Bill Walton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Riches v. Hughes et al
as 5:2010cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Amanda Hughes, Residential Drug Abuse Program and Kristen Hungness
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abdulmutallab et al v. Shahzad et al
as 5:2010cv00093
Plaintiff:
Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, Jonathan Lee Riches and Hakimullah Mehsud
Defendant:
Faisal Shahzad and Huma Asif Mian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodack et al v. Auriemma et al
as 5:2010cv00059
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rodack, Jonathan Lee Riches and Mireya Throop
Defendant:
Geno Auriemma, Maya Moore, Tina Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. The Sporting News et al
as 4:2010cv00037
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
The Sporting News, Whitney Shaw, Ray Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Harvard Business Review et al
as 4:2009cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Harvard Business Review, Henry J. Boye, Alex Clemente and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Jones et al
as 5:2009cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery, Jay Harris and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Field & Stream Magazine et al
as 1:2009cv00047
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Field & Stream Magazine, Jonas Bonnier, Tony Snow and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
