Cases 121 - 130 of 28,536
Webb v. Zips Car Wash, LLC
as 3:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
James Webb
Defendant:
Zips Car Wash, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00466
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00468
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hogan v. Edmonson County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Robert Eugene Hogan
Defendant:
Edmonson County Sheriff Department and Tim Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. GFS Transport, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00106
Defendant:
Kyle Arnold and GFS Transport, LLC
Plaintiff:
Rossman Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Corriveau et al v. Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00107
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary Corriveau and John Corriveau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00465
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Sneed v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 5:2024cv00136
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Sneed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norton Hospitals, Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 3:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Norton Hospitals, Inc.
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Mutual Insurance Company and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ag Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
