Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Lawson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2018cv00361
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Jerome Lawson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Trust Fund of U.S.P. - Big Sandy, Arrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2018cv00362
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lawson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cameron v. State of Kentucky et al
as 4:2018cv00072
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Cameron
Defendant:
State of Kentucky, Henderson County Detention Center, Amy Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv00270
Petitioner:
Andrew Fields, III
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kick v. Prisoner Transport Services LLC et al
as 5:2016cv00074
Plaintiff:
John D Kick
Defendant:
Prisoner Transport Services LLC, Hopkinsville Kentucky County Jail and Hopkinsville Kentucky County Executive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robledo-Valdez v. White PTS Lieutenant (Doe) et al
as 4:2016cv00032
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Robledo-Valdez
Defendant:
Prison Transport Services, White PTS Lieutenant (Doe) and Black PTS Lieutenant (Doe)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carn v. USP Big Sandy Federal of Prison
as 3:2015cv00768
Plaintiff:
Danny Carn
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy Federal of Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSEBERRY v. PRISONER TRANSPORT SERVICES et al
as 4:2015cv00126
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ARDEN ROSEBERRY
Defendant:
PRISONER TRANSPORT SERVICES, THOR CATALOGNE, GOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Osbourne et al
as 4:2015cv00001
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Craig James
Defendant:
David Osbourne, Daviess Co. Detention Center, P.T.S. ILC Prisoner Transport Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Eddyville Prison
as 3:2013cv01079
Plaintiff:
Fleece Jerome Johnson
Defendant:
Eddyville Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
