Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Harper v. Oldham County Police Department et al
as 3:2011cv00352
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Harper
Defendant:
Oldham County Police Department, James R. Brown, Scott Veech and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Tindall et al
as 3:2011cv00265
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Harper
Defendant:
Jeff Tindall and Mike Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2011cv00037
Plaintiff:
Eva Valarie Harper
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wiggins et al v. Daymar Colleges Group, LLC et al
as 5:2011cv00036
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wiggins , Jason West , Joseph McConnell and others
Defendant:
Daymar Colleges Group, LLC , Daymar Learning of Paducah, Inc , Daymar Learning of Ohio, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harper v. Oldham County Jail et al
as 3:2011cv00069
Plaintiff:
Samuel Joseph Harper
Defendant:
Oldham County Jail, John Mason, Jeff McGohon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper et al v. Oldham County Jail et al
as 3:2010cv00735
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Harper and Gualberto Telles
Defendant:
Oldham County Jail, Michael Simpson, Jessica Childress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Greenheck Fan Corporation
as 3:2010cv00171
Plaintiff:
Melissa Harper
Defendant:
Greenheck Fan Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Harper v. Oldham County Jail et al
as 3:2009cv00993
Plaintiff:
Samuel Joseph Harper
Defendant:
Oldham County Jail, John Mason, Jeff McGohon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
