Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Lancaster v. Big G Express, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Zachary Lancaster
Defendant:
Big G Express, Inc. doing business as RTR Transportation Services and Aerias Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Mason et al v. GMG Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00555
Plaintiff:
Nathan Mason, Abigail Mason and Nathan and Abigail Mason
Defendant:
GMG Express, Inc. and Jakisha Maloy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Wallace v. Stageline Express, Inc
as 3:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Anthony B Wallace
Defendant:
Stageline Express, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bynum v. Pan American Cargo, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Michael Bynum
Defendant:
Pan American Cargo, Inc., Mayiquel Toussaint, J&V Logistics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Serpico v. Robinson et al
as 5:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Serpico, Jr.
Defendant:
Vonda F. Robinson and Heartland Express Inc. of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Govea v. Mezo et al
as 5:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Martin Govea
Defendant:
David B. Mezo and Shawnee Express Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Guseynov v. Shawnee Express, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00182
Plaintiff:
Alik Guseynov
Defendant:
Shawnee Express, Inc. and David B. Mezo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fritz v. Maynard et al
as 3:2021cv00610
Plaintiff:
Jordan R. Fritz
Defendant:
David L. Maynard and Alabama Motor Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 mv
Velox Express, Inc. v. Velox Services, L.L.C.
as 4:2021cv00082
Plaintiff:
Velox Express, Inc.
Defendant:
Velox Services, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
