Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Scott v. Kerr et al
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Neil Kerr, Elizabeth Oneal Teal, County Attorny's Office Logan County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kerr v. Narciso Tress et al
as 3:2022cv00660
Plaintiff:
Dave Kerr
Defendant:
Narciso Tress, FedEx Corporate Services, Inc., FedEx Custom Critical, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
BusinessFirst Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Kerr v. Lindblom et al
as 3:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Kerr
Defendant:
Josh Lindblom, Sargent Gordon and Deputy Jailer Crosswhite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kerr v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv00241
Plaintiff:
Shannon Marie Kerr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kerr v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv00313
Plaintiff:
Hope Kerr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kerr v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv00160
Plaintiff:
Denise Kerr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Snow v. Leveridge et al
as 1:2014cv00135
Plaintiff:
Jonas Lee Snow
Defendant:
Matthew Leveridge, Kevin Shearer, Russell County Sheriff Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kerr v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 4:2012cv00057
Petitioner:
David R. Kerr
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky and Randy White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Snow v. Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00078
Plaintiff:
Steve E. Snow
Defendant:
Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A., Inc., Iovate Health Sciences Group, Inc., Iovate Health Sciences Research, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
