Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Garner v. East Baton Rouge District Attorney's Office et al
as 2:2023cv07079
Plaintiff:
Demetric Rashord Garner
Defendant:
East Baton Rouge District Attorney's Office, Jason Robinson, Hillar C. Moore, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Taylor v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 2:2023cv01548
Plaintiff:
Eugene Hathon Taylor, IV
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Andrew Semple, Jennifer Kolbe and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Okun et al v. City of New Orleans et al
as 2:2021cv01345
Plaintiff:
Andrew Okun and Erin Wilson
Defendant:
Latoya Cantrell, Gilbert Montano and New Orleans City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGee et al v. Lopinto et al
as 2:2021cv00571
Defendant:
ABC Insurance Agency, Samuel Norton, Blake Nuzzo and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan O'Quinn, Inez Simmons and Tiffany McGee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diodene v. Gusman et al
as 2:2021cv00491
Defendant:
Warden Chaz Ruiz, Sergeant Chris Rubio, Sheriff Marlin N. Gusman and others
Petitioner:
LPN Heather Diodene
Plaintiff:
Heather Diodene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Gusman et al
as 2:2020cv01677
Defendant:
Andrew Pratt, Michael D. Edmonson, Marlin N. Gusman and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Erling Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gressett v. Gusman et al
as 2:2018cv10893
Plaintiff:
Andrew Gressett
Defendant:
Unidentified Parties, Marlin Gusman and Joseph Lopinto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
