Cases 91 - 100 of 7,729
Curry v. USA
as 2:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
Lloyd E Curry
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
Sherman v. Thibodaux Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv06833
Plaintiff:
Craig James Sherman, Sr
Defendant:
Thibodaux Police Department and Jason Slosarex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Morrison et al
as 2:2023cv07216
Plaintiff:
Bernard Randy Williams
Defendant:
M Morrison, J Pichon, J McCubbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. USA
as 2:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Jonathan Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
Anderson v. Hooper et al
as 2:2023cv06735
Plaintiff:
Maurice Anderson
Defendant:
Tim Hooper and Louisiana State
Respondent:
Louisiana State Attorney General's Office and Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abrams v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Timothy Abrams
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, Travis W Day, Rayburn Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. Bordelon
as 2:2023cv06981
Petitioner:
Rudy Francis
Respondent:
Warden Donnie Bordelon and Attorney General State of Louisiana
Defendant:
Donnie Bordelon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Hooper et al
as 2:2023cv06879
Plaintiff:
Jakorey Williams
Defendant:
Timothy Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neville v. USA
as 2:2024cv00016
Petitioner:
Curtis Neville
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
