Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Reed v. Tanner et al
as 2:2014cv02646
Plaintiff:
Joseph Reed
Defendant:
Robert C Tanner and Ivy Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Cain et al
as 2:2014cv02484
Plaintiff:
Irving Jake Morris
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv02028
Plaintiff:
Michael G Morris
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Morris et al
as 2:2014cv01171
Plaintiff:
Damon Thomas
Defendant:
Ivy Morris and Robert C Tanner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gardner v. Louisiana State Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv05866
Plaintiff:
Theoplious Gardner
Defendant:
Louisiana State Department of Corrections, James LeBlanc, Robert C Tanner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Gusman et al
as 2:2013cv05034
Plaintiff:
Morris J. Green
Defendant:
Marlin N. Gusman , Lester Burn , Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Cayce et al
as 2:2013cv04898
Plaintiff:
James Allen Morris
Defendant:
Lyle W. Cayce and Monica Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Gusman et al
as 2:2012cv02896
Plaintiff:
Morris J. Green
Defendant:
Marlin N Gusman and Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Tanner et al
as 2:2012cv01497
Plaintiff:
Darryl Davis
Defendant:
Robert Tanner and Ivy Morris
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gardner v. Tanner et al
as 2:2012cv00746
Plaintiff:
Theoplious Gardner
Defendant:
Robert Tanner and Ivy Morris
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
