Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Grayer v. Martin et al
as 2:2023cv01133
Plaintiff:
Albert Anthony Grayer
Defendant:
Heath Martin, T. Lane, Michael Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Myers, et al
as 2:2022cv04231
Plaintiff:
Robert Stanley Lane, Jr.
Defendant:
Marcus Myers and Raymond Laborde Correctional Center
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallace v. Tangipahoa Parish Jail et al
as 2:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Wallace, Jr.
Defendant:
Tangipahoa Parish Jail, Tangipahoa Parish Sheriff Office, Correct Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spikes v. Elayn Hunt Correctional Center et al
as 2:2019cv12253
Defendant:
Major Lane and Elayn Hunt Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Jason J Spikes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Vannoy et al
as 2:2019cv03449
Defendant:
Darryl Vannoy
Plaintiff:
Robert Stanley Lane, Jr.
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lane v. USA
as 2:2013cv04720
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kaven Lane, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
Lane v. Rogers
as 2:2012cv00340
Plaintiff:
Helen Lane
Defendant:
Jim Rogers
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Georgetown v. Rader et al
as 2:2010cv00699
Plaintiff:
Walter Rhodas Georgetown
Defendant:
Warden Rader, Lane Thomas, Kent Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Georgetown v. Rader et al
as 2:2009cv04619
Plaintiff:
Walter R. Georgetown
Defendant:
Warden Rader, Lane Thomas, John Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dupree v. Thomas et al
as 2:2009cv04404
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dupree
Defendant:
Lane Thomas, John Bell, Joy Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
