Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Richardson v. Deville et al
as 2:2017cv10194
Plaintiff:
Anthony Richardson
Defendant:
Keith Deville
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armstead v. Deville et al
as 2:2017cv05947
Plaintiff:
Randolph Armstead
Defendant:
Keith Deville
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Deville
as 2:2017cv00506
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Adams
Defendant:
Keith Deville
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wallace v. Deville et al
as 2:2017cv00407
Plaintiff:
Prentiss Arnold Wallace
Defendant:
Keith Deville
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holden v. Winn Correctional Center et al
as 2:2016cv17889
Plaintiff:
Diverious Holden, Sr.
Defendant:
Winn Correctional Center, Keith Deville, Bob Dietier, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Deville, et al
as 2:2016cv14260
Plaintiff:
Eric Hill
Defendant:
Keith Deville
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hamm v. Deville et al
as 2:2015cv05012
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lee Hamm
Defendant:
Keith Deville
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Deville et al
as 2:2015cv04084
Plaintiff:
Steve Smith
Defendant:
Keith Deville
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Keys v. Deville
as 2:2015cv01801
Plaintiff:
Charles R Keys
Defendant:
Keith Deville
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bruce v. Deville
as 2:2015cv01008
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Herman Bruce
Defendant:
Keith Deville
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
