Cases 61 - 70 of 1,082
Jones v. Public Safety & Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00184
Petitioner:
Veran Jones
Respondent:
Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, Marcus Meyers and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strickland v. Hooper
as 3:2022cv00165
Petitioner:
Lawson Eugene Strickland
Defendant:
Warden Timothy Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly v. Hooper et al
as 3:2022cv00164
Petitioner:
420218 Timothy Deshon Kelly and Timothy Deshon Kelly
Respondent:
Tim Hooper and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stephens v. Myers
as 3:2022cv00154
Petitioner:
John Ryan Stephens
Respondent:
Marcus Myers and Attorney General Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Hooper et al
as 3:2022cv00125
Defendant:
Warden Tim Hooper and Randy Demond Parker
Respondent:
Tim Hooper and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darville v. Hall et al
as 3:2022cv00054
Petitioner:
Donovan Darville
Respondent:
Paul Hall and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Broadway v. Hooper et al
as 3:2022cv00041
Petitioner:
Kevin Broadway
Respondent:
Tim Hooper and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Hooper et al
as 3:2021cv00738
Petitioner:
George A. Carter
Respondent:
Unknown Hooper and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gaudet v. Hooper et al
as 3:2021cv00714
Petitioner:
Christopher Gaudet
Respondent:
Tim Hooper and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sneed v. Hooper
as 3:2021cv00704
Plaintiff:
Bobby Sneed
Defendant:
Tim Hooper, James LeBlanc and Brian Spillman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
