Cases 1 - 10 of 124
Mosby v. Landry et al
as 3:2017cv00497
Respondent:
N Burl Cain and Jeff Landry
Petitioner:
Kirk Mosby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patton v. Cain et al
as 3:2016cv00010
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and Jeff Landry
Petitioner:
Billy Patton
Defendant - Consolidated:
Darryl Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00856
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Petitioner:
Chris Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murray v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00827
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell
Petitioner:
Larry Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00795
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell
Petitioner:
George Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hammond v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00796
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Ronnie Hammond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lloyd v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00768
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell
Petitioner:
Ontario Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Cain
as 3:2015cv00746
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain
Petitioner:
Sidney Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00648
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Nate Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Scott v. Cain
as 3:2015cv00514
Respondent:
N Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Petitioner:
William Scott, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
