Cases 31 - 40 of 293
Yoakum v. Berryhill
as 3:2020cv00824
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services and Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Sherri Deanne Yoakum
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Richard v. Saul et al
as 3:2020cv00804
Plaintiff:
Conrad Richard
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul, Unknown Elkin, Lt. Col. Unknown Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Clubb v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00767
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ann Clubb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Slocum v. Social Security
as 3:2020cv00815
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Ann Slocum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Sproles et al v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00777
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Bobby F. Sproles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sibley v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00759
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff:
Stephen L Sibley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ross v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00629
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ross
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Davis et al v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00621
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Brett Deshawn Davis
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Tiffith v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00617
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tiffith
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00724
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.