Cases 11 - 20 of 155
Harmony Behavioral Health Services, LLC v. Kent et al
as 3:2023cv00424
Plaintiff:
Harmony Behavioral Health Services, LLC
Defendant:
Louis Kent, Chrissie O'Quin, Jeff Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Williams v. Town Of Clinton et al
as 3:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
Maurice Williams
Defendant:
Town Of Clinton and Charles Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sibley et al v. Dick et al
as 3:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Brandon Albert Sibley and Howard Gary Brown
Defendant:
Shelly D Dick, William Brown, Jeff B. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Haywood v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00871
Plaintiff:
Clayton Haywood
Defendant:
Vincent Williams, A. Rolle Met, Layle Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams v. Sanders et al
as 3:2022cv00858
Plaintiff:
Damone Williams
Defendant:
Darryl Sanders and The City of Baton Rouge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guidry v. Guidry et al
as 3:2022cv00669
Plaintiff:
Michele M Guidry and Michele Guidry
Defendant:
Amanda Guidry, Jami Leigh Guidry, Sheriff Sid J Gautreaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coleman v. City of New Roads et al
as 3:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
Monica Coleman
Defendant:
City of New Roads, Cornell Dukes, Kevin McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
