Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Joseph v. Roszczvnialsk et al
as 3:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Joseph
Defendant:
Nicholas Roszczvnialsk, Sanford Ron and Kathryn E. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Imani et al v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2017cv00439
Defendant:
Melvin Lee Holden, City of Baton Rouge, Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Plaintiff:
Blair Imani, Akeem Muhammad, Raae Pollard and others
Interested Party:
James W Craig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. East Feliciana District Attorney's Office
as 3:2022cv00519
Plaintiff:
Kyiwann Jones
Defendant:
East Feliciana District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. The Louisiana State Board of Private Security Examiners et al
as 3:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
Preston Jones
Defendant:
The Louisiana State Board of Private Security Examiners and Fabian Blache, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Buchicchio v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Buchicchio
Defendant:
Secretary James M. LeBlanc, Kirt Guerin, Steven Juge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. United Rentals Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00509
Plaintiff:
Edward Jones
Defendant:
United Rentals, Inc., Karen Pesson and Chase Melanchon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McNeil v. Welborn et al
as 3:2021cv00081
Defendant:
Melissa Jones David and Doug Welborn
Plaintiff:
Eric Paul McNeil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
