Cases 101 - 110 of 5,157
Lazard v. ELMHS et al
as 3:2023cv01474
Petitioner:
Kip Lazard
Respondent:
ELMHS and Laura-Beth Lott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cage v. Louisiana State Penitentiary
as 3:2023cv01462
Plaintiff:
Percy Cage
Defendant:
Louisiana State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stracener v. State of Louisiana
as 3:2023cv01464
Plaintiff:
Charles Stracener
Defendant:
State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2023cv01416
Petitioner:
Rodrick Coleman and Dre
Respondent:
State of Louisiana and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Powell v. Broome et al
as 3:2023cv01395
Plaintiff:
Kim Powell
Defendant:
Sharon Weston Broome, Murphy J. Paul, Jr., Brandon Boudreaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trim v. Biethson
as 3:2023cv01357
Plaintiff:
Joseph Trim
Defendant:
Earst O. Biethson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. U.S. Attorney Office et al
as 3:2023cv01356
Plaintiff:
Antoine Edwards
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney Office and Indian Claim Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01347
Plaintiff:
Chadwick Wright
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Katie Ard, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. State of Louisiana
as 3:2023cv01336
Plaintiff:
Anthony Davis
Defendant:
State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trackling v. Hunter et al
as 3:2023cv01342
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Trackling
Defendant:
Unknown Hunter and Unknown Matthew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
