Cases 121 - 130 of 288
Walker v. Cain et al
as 3:2013cv00247
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Petitioner:
Nate Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joseph v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2013cv00229
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain, Jason Coleman, Jason Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Joseph
Interested Party:
William L. Kline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mott v. Cain et al
as 3:2013cv00235
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Petitioner:
Clarence Mott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lavergne v. Cain et al
as 3:2013cv00233
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain, Ken Norse, Angie Norwood and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Scott Lavergne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Cain et al
as 3:2013cv00225
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Petitioner:
Felton Love
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George v. Cain et al
as 3:2013cv00206
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain, Kenneth Johnson, Fredrick Payton and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiggins v. Cain et al
as 3:2013cv00198
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Lorenzo C. Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Cain et al
as 3:2013cv00190
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Petitioner:
Larry A. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bates v. Cain
as 3:2013cv00172
Petitioner:
Paul M Bates
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Cain et al
as 3:2013cv00144
Plaintiff:
Matt Banks
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain, Jason Collion, Trish Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
