Cases 41 - 50 of 5,144
Trim v. Bickham et al
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Joseph Trim
Defendant:
Earist D. Bickham, Nurse at DCI, Doctors at DCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Michael Nelson
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc and Unknown Employee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Triplet v. East Baton Rouge Parish Prison et al
as 3:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Triplet
Defendant:
East Baton Rouge Parish Prison, Riverbend Detention Center, East Carol Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCall v. LSP Investigation Service et al
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Eric McCall
Defendant:
LSP Investigation Service, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holden v. Beckham
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Tony Delon Holden
Defendant:
Dustin Beckham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Matthews
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Shannon Alexander
Defendant:
Unknown Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zierhut v. Louisiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Bruce Zierhut
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Corrections, Louisiana State Prison Hospital, Unknown LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilliam v. Department of Public Safety and Corrections
as 3:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Hugh Gilliam
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Copelin v. Barton et al
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Darrius Randy Copelin
Defendant:
Ruthie Barton, Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
