Cases 51 - 60 of 5,144
Ricks v. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
Wesley Ricks
Respondent:
Department of Justice, Brian L. Spillman and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. East Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
East Baton Rouge, West Baton Rouge and Corey Felder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Hooper
as 3:2023cv01631
Plaintiff:
Antoine Edwards
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disiere v. USA
as 3:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
David Judd Disiere
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gaspard v. Jackson et al
as 3:2023cv01671
Plaintiff:
Charles Gaspard
Defendant:
Brian A. Jackson, John W. deGravelles, Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ducksworth v. West Baton Rouge Parish Detention Center et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
McKelvin Ducksworth
Defendant:
West Baton Rouge Parish Detention Center, J Joseph and Bryan K Bellelo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trackling v. Matthew
as 3:2023cv01593
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Trackling
Defendant:
Unknown Matthew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roach v. Robicheaux
as 3:2023cv01655
Plaintiff:
Donaven D. Roach
Defendant:
Lt. Logan Robicheaux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damm v. Garrett et al
as 3:2023cv01678
Petitioner:
Gregory Damm
Respondent:
C. Garrett and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Napier v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv01692
Petitioner:
Jamy Napier
Respondent:
Tarvald Anthony Smith, Jeremy Wiley and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
