Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Christmas v. Biden et al
as 3:2023cv01273
Plaintiff:
Rayshawn J. Christmas
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., John Bel Edwards, James M LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Guerin et al
as 3:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Columbus Chris Williams
Defendant:
K Guerin, Jeff Landry, James M. LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McLaughlin v. Hooper et al
as 3:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Roy H. McLaughlin, Jr.
Defendant:
Tim Hooper, Shannon Demars, Paul Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damond v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2022cv00490
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Defendant:
City of Baton Rouge, Lallie Kemp Regional Medical Center, East Baton Rouge, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Guerin et al
as 3:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Columbus Chris Williams
Defendant:
K Guerin, Jeff Landry, James M. LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparks v. Vannoy et al
as 3:2020cv00020
Respondent:
Jeff Landry and Darrel Vannoy
Petitioner:
Thomas Sparks and Thomas Sparks/Abdullah H. El-Mumit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mercer v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2019cv00754
Plaintiff:
Todd H Mercer
Defendant:
James LeBlanc and Darrel Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mercer v. Soong et al
as 3:2019cv00442
Plaintiff:
Todd H Mercer
Defendant:
Unknown Macmurdo, Unknown Beckham, Unknown Soong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Williams et al
as 3:2019cv00150
Defendant:
West Harris, Walter Johnson, Ricky Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Ben H. Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2019cv00034
Defendant:
Darryl Vannoy, James M. LeBlanc, Butch H. Browning and others
Plaintiff:
Kenan Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
