Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Mitchell v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00090
Petitioner:
Andrew Mitchell
Respondent:
Tim Hooper and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
James v. East Baton Rouge City Parish et al
as 3:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Michael A. James and Conner A. James
Defendant:
East Baton Rouge City Parish, Sid J. Gautreaux, III, Joshua Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Criss v. Cooper et al
as 3:2022cv00879
Petitioner:
Brian Criss
Respondent:
Andrew Cooper and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
James et al v. Clark et al
as 3:2022cv00604
Plaintiff:
Michael A. James, Conner A. James, Michael A James, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Joshua Clark, Jordan Webb, Nathan Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Livingston Parish Detention Center
as 3:2021cv00255
Defendant:
Livingston Parish Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Ohmer
as 3:2021cv00084
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Andrews
Defendant:
Margie Ohmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Livingston Parish Detention Center et al
as 3:2021cv00021
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Andrews
Defendant:
Livingston Parish Detention Center and Government/Society
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Livingston Parish Detention Center et al
as 3:2020cv00872
Defendant:
Livingston Parish Sheriff's Department and Livingston Parish Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Facebook et al
as 3:2020cv00596
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Andrews
Defendant:
Facebook and Mark Zuchumburger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Performance Contracters
as 3:2020cv00597
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Andrews
Defendant:
Performance Contracters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
