Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Brouchet v. Attorney General et al
as 2:2022cv05612
Plaintiff:
Frederick Dean Brouchet
Defendant:
TX Attorney General and Chase Bank Lake Charles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. J P Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 5:2021cv04207
Plaintiff:
Kareem Johnson
Defendant:
Deon Morris, L L P, J P Morgan Chase Bank and Deon Morris L L P
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132
Ceasar v. Capital One Bank et al
as 5:2018cv00557
Plaintiff:
R Ceasar
Defendant:
Capital One Bank, Chase Bank, Regions Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01632
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Curley et al v. Bank One
as 6:2014cv02633
Plaintiff:
Sandra Curley and Mark Curley
Defendant:
J P Morgan Chase Bank N A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Iberia Texaco Food Mart L L C et al v. Ackal et al
as 6:2012cv01450
Plaintiff:
Iberia Texaco Food Mart L L C and Sakhawat Hossain
Defendant:
Louis M Ackal, J P Morgan Chase Bank N A, Jason Comeaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jacob et al v. Ackal
as 6:2012cv01338
Plaintiff:
Emmette Jacob , Cupids Closet of New Iberia L L C and Emmette Enterprises L L C
Defendant:
Louis M Ackal , J P Morgan Chase Bank N A, Jason Comeaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nale v. J P Morgan Chase Bank N A et al
as 5:2009cv01503
Plaintiff:
Joan Nale
Defendant:
J P Morgan Chase Bank N A, J P Morgan Chase Bank N A, Tomika Tolliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tucker v. J P Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 5:2009cv00474
Plaintiff:
Tommie Tucker
Defendant:
J P Morgan Chase Bank and Jamie Dimmond
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
