Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Hill v. Franklin Parish Detention Center et al
as 3:2023cv01577
Plaintiff:
Curtis Hill
Defendant:
Franklin Parish Detention Center and Anthony Lemoine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Franklin Parish Detention Center
as 3:2023cv00749
Plaintiff:
Darrell A Thomas
Defendant:
Franklin Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Franklin Parish Detention Center
as 1:2023cv00749
Plaintiff:
Darrell Thomas
Defendant:
Franklin Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Williams
as 5:2022cv05407
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Franklin
Defendant:
Dusty Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tran v. Franklin Parish Detention Center et al
as 3:2022cv00891
Plaintiff:
Tran M Tran and Tam Minh Tran
Defendant:
Franklin Parish Detention Center, Kelvin Cobb and Chad Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Batiste v. Cobb et al
as 3:2021cv02333
Plaintiff:
Toi Batiste
Defendant:
Kevin W Cobb and Franklin Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Franklin Parish Medical Center et al
as 3:2021cv02274
Plaintiff:
Donald Eugene Daniels, Jr
Defendant:
Franklin Parish Medical Center and E R Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muse v. Franklin Parish Detention Center et al
as 3:2020cv01013
Defendant:
Franklin Parish Detention Center, Mail Officers Franklin Parish and Chad Lee
Plaintiff:
William A Muse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Russell et al
as 3:2020cv00174
Defendant:
Jay Russell, Dorathy and Andre
Plaintiff:
Douglas Franklin Heard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Perez-Montes et al
as 1:2019cv01581
Defendant:
T Thomas, Joseph H L Perez-Montes and Dee D Drell
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
