Cases 1 - 10 of 694
Lewis-Bey v. Cox
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Carlos Devon Lewis-Bey
Defendant:
J W Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hughes v. Guidroz et al
as 6:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Harold Hughes, Jr
Defendant:
Bobby Guidroz, Jessie Bellard, J Pickens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Funches v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Cecil Funches
Defendant:
USA, Lt Renae, J Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Triplet v. East Baton Rouge Parish Prison et al
as 3:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
Johnathan J Triplet
Defendant:
East Baton Rouge Parish Prison, Riverbend Detention Center, Sheriff Office East Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Office v. Raymond Laborde Correctional Center
as 1:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Brandon J Office
Defendant:
Raymond Laborde Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lugman v. Cox
as 1:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Abdul K Lugman
Defendant:
J W Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gash v. Gaspard
as 6:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Darell J Gash and Darell Jonic Gash
Defendant:
Brentt Gaspard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodin v. Cox
as 3:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Goodin
Defendant:
Warden Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Bennet et al
as 3:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Jones
Defendant:
Clay Bennet and Shondra Kirkland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scarborough v. Rapides Parish Detention Center I et al
as 1:2023cv01695
Plaintiff:
Desmond Deondre Scarborough
Defendant:
Rapides Parish Detention Center I, Guard Phibbs, Guard Fullers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
