Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Thymes v. Sans Chevaux Investments LLC et al
as 6:2018cv00867
Defendant:
A T & T Mobility L L C, L'Auberge Casino & Hotel, C I A and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Gene Thymes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv00878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Thibodeaux v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00261
Plaintiff:
Kelly Marie Thibodeaux
Defendant:
A T & T Mobility Services L L C , A T & T Corp and A T & T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thibodeaux v. A T & T Mobility Services L L C et al
as 6:2017cv00261
Plaintiff:
Kelly Marie Thibodeaux
Defendant:
A T & T Mobility Services L L C , A T & T Corp and A T & T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv01719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Leong et al v. Zodiac Newco L L C et al
as 6:2012cv00711
Plaintiff:
Arnold Leong , Raveesh Kumra , Cell-CalV-T6 and others
Defendant:
Cellco Partnership , Centennial Communications Corp , A T & T Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thibodeaux v. A T & T Mobility Services L L C
as 2:2012cv00466
Plaintiff:
Shamekia Thibodeaux
Defendant:
A T & T Mobility Services L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mazeitis v. A T & T Mobility L L C
as 6:2009cv02179
Plaintiff:
Heather Mazeitis
Defendant:
A T & T Mobility L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Sandoz v. Cingular Wireless L L C et al
as 6:2007cv01308
Plaintiff:
Courtney Sandoz
Defendant:
Cingular Wireless L L C, Cingular Wireless L L C, Cingular Wireless L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
