Cases 41 - 50 of 96
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Massachusetts Bay Insurance Co v. Usie et al
as 6:2017cv01600
Plaintiff:
Massachusetts Bay Insurance Co
Defendant:
Doris H Usie and Royer Mobile Homes of Opelousas Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Team Marketing Group Inc et al v. Hyde et al
as 5:2017cv01389
Plaintiff:
Team Marketing Group Inc and World Class Marketing Services L L C
Defendant:
Budget Mobile L L C , Budget Prepay Inc and Robert Daniel Hyde, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv00878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Leland v. Exxon Mobil
as 1:2017cv00718
Plaintiff:
Jamesetta Leland
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Agri South Group L L C et al v. Exxon Mobil Corp et al
as 1:2017cv00388
Defendant:
Parawon Corp , Paul Broadhead Succession , Sherry Monroe Broadhead and others
Plaintiff:
Agri-South Group L L C , King Brothers Land Co , Plugg Road L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Leland v. X T O Energy et al
as 1:2017cv00323
Plaintiff:
Jamesetta Leland
Defendant:
X T O Energy, Exxon and Exon Mobil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thibodeaux v. A T & T Mobility Services L L C et al
as 6:2017cv00261
Plaintiff:
Kelly Marie Thibodeaux
Defendant:
A T & T Mobility Services L L C , A T & T Corp and A T & T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thibodeaux v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00261
Plaintiff:
Kelly Marie Thibodeaux
Defendant:
A T & T Mobility Services L L C , A T & T Corp and A T & T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leland v. Exxon Mobil et al
as 1:2017cv00242
Plaintiff:
Jamesetta Leland
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil and X T O Energy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
