Cases 81 - 90 of 132
Stine v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2014cv00451
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glen Stine
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden Federal Correctional Complex Oakdale and Asst Warden Federal Correctional Complex Oakdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blakes v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2014cv00421
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Thomas Blake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ennis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2014cv00170
Plaintiff:
Quenta Ennis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and D Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Ask-Carlson et al
as 1:2013cv02428
Plaintiff:
Derrick D Morris
Defendant:
K Ask-Carlson and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reid v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2013cv02149
Plaintiff:
Gordon C Reid
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schreane v. USA et al
as 5:2012cv02589
Plaintiff:
Clarence Schreane
Defendant:
USA and Representatives of Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tiscareno v. Ask-Carlson et al
as 1:2012cv02585
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tiscareno
Defendant:
Ask-Carlson, H Mitchell and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mesa v. Ask-Carlson et al
as 1:2012cv02273
Plaintiff:
John Mesa
Defendant:
Ask-Carlson and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dedrick v. Holder et al
as 2:2012cv02269
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lewis Dedrick
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Prison Officials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frost v. Young et al
as 2:2012cv01985
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Jaye Frost
Defendant:
J P Young , Arthur F Beeler , John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
