Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co L L C v. Delta Gulf Corp et al
as 5:2012cv00030
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co L L C
Defendant:
Delta Gulf Corp, William A Leone and HoneyBee Hams Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frith v. O A S / North Jails et al
as 3:2011cv00187
Plaintiff:
Terdevon Frith, Sr
Defendant:
O A S / North Jails, Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, Chad Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvarez-Cuevas v. Pine Prairie Correctional Center et al
as 6:2010cv00341
Plaintiff:
Henry Alvarez-Cuevas
Defendant:
Pine Prairie Correctional Center, Hams, D Viator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garner v. Richland Parish Detention Center et al
as 3:2009cv00670
Plaintiff:
Kalvin Garner
Defendant:
Richland Parish Detention Center, Ham, A Cupp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lattier v. Cupp et al
as 3:2009cv00339
Plaintiff:
Tobias M Lattier
Defendant:
Allen Cupp, Ham, Medical Dept Richland Parish Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Woolens v. Cupp et al
as 3:2009cv00340
Defendant:
Allen Cupp, Ham, Medical Dept Richland Parish Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Woolens
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Daniels v. Cupp et al
as 3:2009cv00345
Plaintiff:
Charlie Daniels
Defendant:
Allen Cupp, Ham, Medical Dept Richland Parish Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wilson v. Cupp et al
as 3:2009cv00344
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wilson
Defendant:
Allen Cupp, Ham, Medical Dept Richland Parish Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
