Cases 111 - 120 of 67,747
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rollo v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv11422
Plaintiff:
Ashley Rollo
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gambill v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11423
Plaintiff:
Mickey Gambill
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rider v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11424
Plaintiff:
Amanda Rider
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Wooten v. Greylock McKinnon Associates, Inc.
as 1:2024cv11429
Plaintiff:
Leland Wooten, JR.
Defendant:
Greylock McKinnon Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Gonzalez v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11425
Plaintiff:
Araceli Gonzalez
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sanchez, MD v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 1:2024cv11428
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Sanchez, MD
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Marshall v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv11431
Plaintiff:
Robert E Marshall and Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Barros et al v. Mattel, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv11420
Plaintiff:
Dane Barros, Sr and Heather Ferreira
Defendant:
Mattel, Inc. and Fisher-Price, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
